"We're in a period of know-nothingism in the country, where truth and science and facts don't weigh in. It's all short-order, lowest common denominator, cheap-seat politics." – Sen. Kerry (D-MA) (boston.com)
This from a man who sits in his tub soaking with his Ketchup queen wife and wonder how he lost to that idiot G.W. Bush.This from a man who wants us to just sit down, shut up and let him and the other lizard overlords rule over us.
Governor & Lt. Gov. – Johnathan Narcisse & Richard Mariar (Iowa Party) Branstad has more than 10 years as Governor and I don’t see a lot of difference between him and Culver. Narcisse is a fighter and believes in the best things for our children and Iowa.
Auditor of State – David Vaudt (Republican Party) His last term.
Treasurer of State – David Jamison (Republican Party)
Sec. of Ag – Bill Northey (Republican Party)
Attorney General – Brenna Findley (Republican Party) Tom Millers second time around has had some good points but still just too long in office.
State Representative – No vote – Scott Raecker (Rep.) has been in for 11 years, just too long.
Co. Treasurer – Mike Adams (Republican Party)
Co. Recorder – Eric Zingler (Republican Party)
Co. Attorney – No Vote – Sarcone has been in too long but has no one running against them.
Judges – I’m voting no on all of them to allow Branstad (if he wins) to have the ability to put in new people if he chooses.
Constitutional Questions 1 – Water and land legacy – No Vote- It wants to set up a 20 million dollar fund, we don’t have the money. 2 – Constitutional convention – No Vote – Even with problems our state constitution is the best we can do and has remedies for any problems we have.
Public Measure for Prairie Meadows Yes – I would like for the casino to be private but the county has been too involved to get out now.
Hopefully that will be how we remember Rep. Boswell, as a name, as a footnote.As for how he represented the 3rd District it was very unremarkable.He has had no reason to be remarkable, the independent vote has asked nothing of him and just falls in line and re-elects him every 2 years.When asked what his 16 years as a congressman has produced his claim was a veteran’s bill to help with suicide issues after serving, don’t get me wrong they need all the help we can give veterans. He also mentioned live stock legislation attached to a farm bill, but after 16 years that is an awful long time to only be able to mention 2 pieces of law when he personally has collected 1.6 to 2 million in salary as a congressman.If he is defeated next week what type of pension will he receive?The only one who has benefited from our relationship with Leonard Boswell is Leonard Boswell.
It is time for a change.Brad Zaun has his own issues like all of us do, and as a people we have struggled with financial and personal issues, he too has been there.As a Councilman, Mayor and State Senator Brad Zaun has always been an honest broker and a man who has been available and in touch with his community.
Neither candidate did anything to hurt themselves, however, no one did anything to help themselves either and that is bad news for Brad Zaun. He is 28 years younger than the Congressman and should have shown a lot more energy and be able to respond more quickly to things like, when Boswell said he was not worried about challengers, I would have said "because you have taken the Independent and Democrat support for granted and don't even try any more."
Most of Boswell's responses were typical main line Democrat. There was absolutely nothing that he said that Barney Frank or Pelosi would disagree with. Brad was very vanilla too, maybe an attempt to win some moderate votes. His one point he did bring home was Boswell's promise to 3 terms and a need for change in D.C. Boswell's response was to tell us he and his seniority is the thin red line between Iowans and congressman from other states that would control everything. Of course those are Democrats so there wouldn't be any difference.
They did agree that we need more boarder security, with no details, and employers need to be held more responsible for hiring illegal immigrants.
Legalization of Marijuana which is on the ballot in California this November has a very good chance of actually passing.I am sure there will be some legal hurtles to jump but it most likely will be available to the general public by next summer.What does this mean for the rest of the nation and how does this conservative feel about this biggest change in drug laws since the end of prohibition.
I have a libertarian ilk in me that wants government out of our lives.Yet I know there are many areas that a government body needs to protect, namely protection of our property.The very reason why we broke away from England was because of a lack of property rights for the colonist.Until just a few years ago, this was not even an issue, however, courts began to agree with local and state government bodies that condemning property for the “greater good” under eminent domain includes for tax purposes.This and other examples are why we should not trust any level of government and should always challenge their logic.
Other areas I believe the government has a right to regulate are ones in which it is difficult for the general population to be an expert in, yet are necessary for our well being, such as pharmaceutical items and the medical industry as a whole.I cannot know the effects of drugs on my body nor do I have the time to investigate most drugs, so I rely on a government agency to regulate the industry.Monopolies in energy, electronics or any industry that is necessary to life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness can be shown to have a need for governmental oversight.
Marijuana is a controlled substance according to federal laws; however, states have used different sets of rules regarding its use.In 14 states there is a maximum amount you can have on you as “personal use” without being arrested, these are different from federal laws however, and it would be very difficult to enforce such small amounts (typically under 2oz).I whole heartedly believe that state laws should trump federal laws when it comes to rights not found in the constitution or its amendments.
According to the UN, about 4% of adults admit to using Marijuana annually, however, that number is probably higher in the US as 42% of adults claim to have used it at some point in their lives.This ranks second to Canada and I found the list of top users interesting, in 3rd is New Zealand followed by Denmark, France and Great Britain. The interesting part is that they are all industrialized, “white” majority populations, I’m not sure what it means but of interest none the less.
The theory of Marijuana being a “Gateway” drug has some validity in that almost anyone who has used harder drugs probably used Marijuana first.Much like alcoholics most likely started with beer as their “gateway” to the other liquors.This is why no one gets truly upset the first time someone drinks a beer but it is still regulated the same as all other alcohols.
To the point:
I believe Marijuana should be kept illegal in any amount for those under 18, Prop 19 allows for only over 21, but again these laws are inconsistent with most laws, either 18 is the “age or majority” or it is not.It is okay for parents to be hypocrites and tell their kids they didn’t do it and neither should they (the kids).For those over 18, a small amount (1 oz or less) should be legal for personal use.This should be sold through much regulated stores, perhaps state ran stores, and not grown in your home or farm.We do not allow bathtub gin to be bottled and sold because it cannot be regulated or taxed.I know and believe that this will continue to create a market which brings the drug up from Mexico and other Central and South America countries but that is why we need to regulate our borders through a fence and better immigration laws (for another blog)
All laws were Marijuana use is found to have influenced a person’s decisions should be the same as under the influence of alcohol. Heavy fines, jail and loss of driving privileges must be part of the punishment for abusing its use.Employers can mandate its employees to not use Marijuana while at work, like other controlled substances, with exceptions for doctor prescriptions.
The irony here is that the very progressives that would sponsor such legislation will later criticize and segregate Marijuana smokers for the same reasons they go after tobacco smokers, pollution (global warming), health issues and taxation.
I am completely satisfied with the current laws in Iowa and if it is never legalized I will be happy with that decision too.Any substance that alters your mind can potentially be harmful to you and should be avoided.
I was reading news on the internet (via popurl.com) and I came across the headline “Lauren Booth converts to Islam” I highlighted the line because the name was not typically one that would be connected to Islam, being a woman, and the summary stated “Sister-in-law to Tony Blair”.This got my attention being a person so close to an international leader who had, in 2007, converted to Catholicism.
Mr. Blair’s wife was born Cherie Booth and Lauren is a half-sister who is a journalist and human rights activist (according to Wikipedia).She works for Press TV which is an English television station owned by Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting.Her experience in recent years has been in the middle-east and has been pro-palestinian.
Women in their early 40’s don’t usually convert, especially to a religion like Islam without something changing in their life.The first thing I thought of was that she had married a man from the middle-east, a check told me that wasn’t it, she was married to a minor actor/screenwriter Craig Darby (not even on IMBD) and has 2 children.So what gives?
In 2009 she had 2 events that might be a clue.She had a fight with her husband, via Facebook and actually changed her status to “single”.Now this might and is nothing but a couple days later Darby had a bad motorcycle accident that put him in a coma.The second event was that all this became known in the media.
There were several articles on these chain of events and although she was treated as a sympathetic person who just got angry for a moment and felt terrible, it still had to take a big toll on her personally.Her husband did recover after about 6 months with several issues including vision and memory.
None of the articles gave any reason for her conversion, but that she has worn traditional clothing and given up pork, alcohol and prays 5 times per day.This is a woman offered in 2001 to model for playboy!I have to believe that she was forced to asses her life and she wasn’t happy with it and despite Islam’s harsh treatment of woman in the middle-east and world wide, she is going for it.No word if her husband or children are converting but if they don’t that divorce maybe coming soon. (guardian.uk)
Like you didn't already know, but I am officially an extremist. Not by my extreme standards but by the NAACP. I'm reading their little story about the "Tea Party" (www.teapartynationalism.com) and all most all the pictures they have posted are extreme and I find inappropriate. I would have liked them sourced (date, tea party rally location) just so I know they are from actually TP rallies and not just other rallies. But I found one quote they used very mild so I must be extreme:
Donna Baker, a TPN member from Gainesboro, Tennessee, for example, wrote: “Yes, things ran quite well before the swarm of manipulated underclasses invaded our country. If they stayed home and made half the effort to change their country as they do marching our streets demanding our laws not be enforced, they could change their own lives. They are blindly being used and manipulated by other forces ... [they are] a huge burgeoning looming voting bloc.”
I don't believe things ran quite well before some date in this persons mind, but if these hard working people did change things back home, it might be a better place. I know that if my ancestors had also demanded better conditions I wouldn't be here either but my ancestors didn't expect this government to take care of them without assimilation.
Are real racists, homophobes and anti-Semites in the movement, yes just like there are communists in the white house (v.jones)
This report takes small incidents, bloggers and just a few photos out of thousands of rallies, millions of people and say they are all this way. I guess we all look the same to the NAACP.
Identify constitutionality of every new law: Require each bill to identify the specific provision of the U.S. Constitution that gives Congress the power to do what the bill does. (82.03%)
Reject emissions trading: Stop the "cap and trade" administrative approach used to control carbon dioxide emissions by providing economic incentives for achieving reductions in the emissions of carbon dioxide. (72.20%)
Demand a balanced federal budget: Begin the Constitutional amendment process to require a balanced budget with a two-thirds majority needed for any tax modification. (69.69%)
Simplify the tax system: Adopt a simple and fair single-rate tax system by scrapping the Internal Revenue Code and replacing it with one that is no longer than 4,543 words – the length of the original Constitution. (64.9%)
Audit federal government agencies for constitutionality: Create a Blue Ribbon taskforce that engages in an audit of federal agencies and programs, assessing their Constitutionality, and identifying duplication, waste, ineffectiveness, and agencies and programs better left for the states or local authorities. (63.37%)
Limit annual growth in federal spending: Impose a statutory cap limiting the annual growth in total federal spending to the sum of the inflation rate plus the percentage of population growth. (56.57%)
Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy: Authorize the exploration of additional energy reserves to reduce American dependence on foreign energy sources and reduce regulatory barriers to all other forms of energy creation. (55.5%)
Reduce Earmarks: Place a moratorium on all earmarks until the budget is balanced, and then require a 2/3 majority to pass any earmark. (55.47%)
Reduce Taxes: Permanently repeal all recent tax increases, and extend current temporary reductions in income tax, capital gains tax and estate taxes, currently scheduled to end in 2011. (53.38%)